Agile is a philosophy, a way of thinking embedded into all Agile methodologies, while Waterfall is a model for project breakdown into linear sequential phases. Learn how the two approaches relate and differ from one another and what are their benefits.
The terms Agile and Waterfall are widely known as embodiments of modern and traditional project management. Agile, on the one hand, represents the new-age approach to project management which emerged out of a necessity to address the dynamics of the customers’ expectations and keep up with the hectic development pace of the market. Waterfall, on the other hand, is one of the most popular traditional project management ways.
Let’s uncover the most underlined differences between the two approaches, how they can both support your projects, and which one should suit you best.
Agile is a philosophy for achieving business agility based on the 12 principles rooted in the Agile Manifesto developed in 2001. At its core, Agile thinking promotes flexibility and adaptability to changes emerging along the process of creating value.
Agile Manifesto values
Waterfall, on the other hand, is a linear model for product development with strict planning and step-by-step plan execution at its heart. It was applied originally in the construction and manufacturing fields for managing highly structured physical projects. The phases of the Waterfall model include initiation (requirements collection), analysis, design, construction (development), testing, deployment, and maintenance.
While Agile originated in the software development domain and Waterfall in manufacturing, both are nowadays employed for managing knowledge work in multiple industry fields. Agile teams are more reactive to changes along the project lifecycle, whereas Waterfall is suitable for projects where the requirements are well-defined, and a clear plan is devised.
Let’s take a closer look at the 6 key parameters defining Agile and Waterfall project management.
Agile vs. sequential work management
Customer satisfaction was defined as the very first principle outlined in the Agile Manifesto. To meet customers’ expectations, Agile projects rely heavily on clients’ availability during the entire process. While customers’ input is the driving force of progress in Agile project management, the Waterfall product development requires customers’ feedback in just a couple of instances. First, feedback is required at the initial stage when requirements are assembled, and work hasn’t started yet. The other instance is towards the end of a project when a big piece of work is completed (such as a product release).
The Initiation phase of the Waterfall model to project management includes gathering and documenting the project requirements. The outcome of this stage is a well-defined project requirements list which serves as input for the next phase of the project cycle. An Agile project, on the other hand, welcomes changing customers’ expectations or market fluctuations and aims to accommodate such alterations along the way in a constructive manner.
Similar to the changing requirements, Agile project management is flexible about project scope changes. To respond to such changes, Agile teams keep a steady pace of frequent delivery to the market and rely on timely feedback. However, when dealing with well-defined projects and strict compliance requirements, the Waterfall approach can be quite beneficial. Once the scope of work is identified, the planning, design, and tracking of the work progress are much easier.
The flexibility that Agile project management promotes ensures that all work is dedicated to a single priority – to “satisfy customers through early and continuous delivery,” as stated in the Agile Manifesto itself. As such, work reprioritization happens on the basis of customers’ feedback. This way, Agile project leaders' and team members’ efforts are focused on creating and delivering value at all times. The Waterfall approach, however, aims to deliver what was defined as a project scope before the work started. The prescriptive model can increase the risk of project failure or inability to cope with changing demands due to the team’s commitment to the defined scope.
Agile teams meet uncertainty with an adaptive attitude and are responsive to changes at every iteration. Agile team members are trusted to self-organize their work in the most optimal way and have a wide-open mind toward feedback which increases their accountability and ownership. As opposed to Waterfall teams that focus on personal performance, the Agile culture highlights the way work flows through the work system and analyzes it. Teams applying the Waterfall approach, on the other hand, are focused on their part of the work. A team member can only be engaged in the project scope definition or design phase, which limits team collaboration and synchronization.
Waterfall projects take the traditional project management approach to planning, where fixed dates and fixed scope are the main drivers of progress. In contrast, planning in Agile project management remains flexible and adaptive to changes. While the step-by-step heavy planning can be beneficial to projects with a well-known scope, in the knowledge work domain, critical changes can emerge and will be addressed even at a later stage of the Agile project's advancement.
Traditional vs. Agile planning process
While both Agile and Waterfall aim at improving the way work is done, they support that mission differently. Let’s discuss what the benefits of the two are, and in what scenarios Agile works better than Waterfall and vice versa.
The emphasis that the Agile philosophy highlights is creating value that meets the customers’ expectations at all times. Furthermore, the Agile mindset promotes doing business in the most optimal way. In other words, to deliver value with great quality and improve customer satisfaction, while keeping the team motivated and engaged.
The Agile way of managing projects, programs, portfolios, or other pieces of work finds application in multiple business fields. It is better suited for projects where management is closely involved while work progresses. Rooted in the software development industry, today, Agile fits well in every niche where knowledge work is involved. Some examples include:
Breaking down projects into a linear sequence of phases makes the Waterfall model one of the most structured approaches to work management. The work progress flows in one direction only, which ensures that expensive design changes, for instance, can be avoided altogether.
The Waterfall framework can be useful in physical environments where structural integrity is critical. As such, the linear approach is beneficial for planning large construction or manufacturing projects. Waterfall is suitable for projects that must comply with strict regulations and requirements where flexibility is limited. Its application to managing creative work led to the emergence of modified Waterfall models that address some issues with the “pure” Waterfall approach.
It is possible to enable agility while still using a highly structured work model as the Waterfall process. Adaptive methods such as Kanban can help you with that mission by putting an emphasis on your current work and improving it in an undisruptive way.
The first step of that journey is to visualize your current work process by mapping all the process steps of your workflow. A Kanban board can help you visualize what your work environment looks like and how work flows in reality. It can guide you to uncover where work gets blocked or what creates waste, regardless of whether you apply Agile or Waterfall processes.
Furthermore, advanced Kanban boards allow you to connect various value streams, such as the work activities of different teams or departments, into a single hub and create a network of services. Thanks to this birds-eye view into your process and its connectedness, you will achieve greater transparency across the entire network.
Connected Kanban boards in Kanbanize
Next, you need to start optimizing the created map of services. To do so, Kanban practices such as limiting the work in progress can drastically reduce multitasking and underline the focus on the work that’s at stake. As a result, you will manage to increase the productivity of your team and deliver customer value faster.
WIP limits on a Kanban board in Kanbanize
Monitoring and analysis of your workflow will gradually turn into a habit to improve the way work is done every day. You won’t need iterations per se to optimize your work delivery process. By creating a system for work where people have clear transparency into the work and priorities at hand, identify process roadblocks, discuss openly improvement ideas, and experiment, you can begin to unlock flexibility in your process.
Encouraging sharing feedback is a cornerstone in the path toward true business agility. Aim at establishing feedback opportunities for everyone involved in a project’s progress. Implementing feedback loops, for instance, is one of the main Kanban practices that ensures synchronization and helps build an information flow. By creating such opportunities, you will lay the foundation of true organizational agility.
Team level feedback loops in Kanban
To understand why Agile is more beneficial than Waterfall, let’s make a head-to-head comparison:
Start your free trial now and get access to all Kanbanize features.
During the 30-day trial period you can invite your team and test the application in a production-like enviroment.